P450:CYP95 - Revision history

Eve at 02:48, 9 September 2012

2012-09-09T02:48:14Z

Adm: New page: =95 Family= Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the ori...

2009-06-21T11:00:00Z

New page: =95 Family= Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the ori...

Adm at 08:22, 21 June 2009

2009-06-21T08:22:34Z

Adm: New page: =95 Family= Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the ori...

2009-06-20T14:00:00Z

Adm: New page: =95 Family= Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the ori...

2009-06-19T08:17:52Z

New page

=95 Family=
Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the original PCR fragment had a frame shift in the I-helix region that caused it to be placed
in a separate family CYP95. The correct sequence is actually the Zea mays homolog of CYP72A, and not in a new family.

{{P450/Table/Header|
{{#repeat:P450/Table/Row|1|
&&CYP95A1X&&Zea mays&&no accession number (318 amino acids)
&&CYP95X&&Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle) PCR fragment&&GenEMBL X69789 (375bp)
&&CYP95X&&Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle) PCR fragment&&GenEMBL X69790 (327bp)
}}
}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 20 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{ {{NAMESPACE}}/Header}}
		+
	=95 Family=		=95 Family=
	Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the original PCR fragment had a frame shift in the I-helix region that caused it to be placed		Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment. With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the original PCR fragment had a frame shift in the I-helix region that caused it to be placed

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 =95 Family=
-Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment.  With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the original PCR fragment had a frame shift in the I-helix region that caused it to be placed
+<big>NO LONGER USED</big>
 in a separate family CYP95.  The correct sequence is actually the Zea mays homolog of CYP72A, and not in a new family.
 {{P450/Table|

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 =95 Family=
-Note concerning the CYP95 family. The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment.  With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the original PCR fragment had a frame shift in the I-helix region that caused it to be placed
+<big>NO LONGER USED</big>
-in a separate family CYP95.  The correct sequence is actually the Zea mays homolog of CYP72A, and not in a new family.
-{{P450/Table/Header|
+The original CYP95 sequence was based on a PCR fragment.  With the submission of the identical gene from another lab, it is clear that the original PCR fragment had a frame shift in the I-helix region that caused it to be placed in a separate family CYP95.  The correct sequence is actually the Zea mays homolog of CYP72A, and not in a new family.
-{{#repeat:P450/Table/Row|1|
 &&CYP95A1X&&Zea mays&&no accession number (318 amino acids)
 &&CYP95X&&Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle) PCR fragment&&GenEMBL X69789 (375bp)
 &&CYP95X&&Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle) PCR fragment&&GenEMBL X69790 (327bp)
 }}